On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This is no where near ready to merge. Lots of stuff missing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>
Overall this is looking very interesting, this is definately where we
want to go with this IMO.
> +static int iio_input_store_to(u8 *data, void *private)
> +{
> + struct iio_input_state *st = private;
> +
> + /* DUMMY - need to put boiler plate conversion code
> + * in place */
> + input_report_abs(st->idev, ABS_X, data[0]);
> + input_sync(st->idev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
If I have understood correctly, a lot of contemporary input handling
is in need of strict timestamping such as available in IIO. (Strict
control feedback loops etc.)
I guess these applications should use the "real" IIO interfaces,
whereas the input interface should be kept as-is?
Or ... is it possible to get the input subsystem to propagate the
timestamps to userspace?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
