On Feb 2 2012, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 02:19:16PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:14:25AM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> I don't think there is any real performance improvement to be expected of
> this patch. If you have good a reason why non-atomic bitops should not be
> used I guess this patch could be dropped.
Actually perhaps it's better to apply this because the code is
already tricky and the double underscores serve as a reminder.
I'm fine with this change.
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
You could also remove the "/* Does anyone care? */ from
iio_push_event() because we do care.
Ah, that one was my bad. Probably written way to late in the evening.
It isn't meant to be a comment about the code, but rather a description
of what is being checked! Literally 'This is checking whether there is anyone
listening'.
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
