On 01/31/2012 05:26 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 01/29/2012 07:18 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> On 12/19/2011 10:29 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: >>> Use the waitqueue lock to protect the event queue instead of a custom mutex. >>> This has the advantage that we can call the waitqueue operations with the lock >>> held, which simplifies the code flow a bit. >>> >>> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Hmm.. I really should have noticed this before.. If this hasn't gone to >> Greg already, can you also clear out the documentation for >> event_list_lock within struct iio_event_interface. Cleaner to do it >> here than in a follow up patch. > > Yes, the whole series has already been send to Greg, but since he hasn't > applied it yet, I suppose I could resend it with your fixes. Either that or just send Greg a small follow up (or I'll get to it at somepoint) None of it is remotely critical! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
