On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:39:31AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Mark Brown > > You avoid user confusion from having two ways of doing the same thing > > and you save a little complexity in the implementation. The user > > confusion does happen in practice. > So I guess this pattern comes from the regulator framework > struct regulator_consumer_supply design pattern initially. Yes, and the only reason the regulator API does this is historical. > But we should then try to rid it from the kernel at large, no big deal, > I have only one in-kernel user of this ATM I think so I can kill it off from > the pin control API if you think you can kill it from regulators. Well volunteered :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
