-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/30/2012 09:22 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:26:10PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> On 01/30/2012 07:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:46:54AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron >>> wrote: > >>>> +static struct iio_map max1363_consumer_map[] = { + { + >>>> .adc_channel_label = "AIN1", + .consumer_dev = >>>> &iio_hwmon_test.dev, + .consumer_channel = "testchan1", > >>> I do think it's better to use dev_name here rather than a >>> struct device pointer - for several of the buses it's not >>> actually possible to get a struct device until a device has >>> been instantiated which isn't helpful for setting up the >>> mappings. > >> We allow both. In cases like this where the dev pointer is >> explicitly available what gain do we get from not using it? > > You avoid user confusion from having two ways of doing the same > thing and you save a little complexity in the implementation. The > user confusion does happen in practice. Good reasoning. Will drop the dev pointer option. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPJxBHAAoJEFSFNJnE9BaIGUwP/2SQjWhWZP28GWpWemx5Av7O 5CUKvDZ/qk+ehevvp0fOKOD/DvciSNWDd/dTmGRllbYzpz7RkbGmV9sm+BFydqyG beTzbF5h5vuvCNfvVrXwePh2/fcm3kSMIOYQSnaDmn5rmZTR0qK6nkh1GdBtMa2T Hbk+qjdQFcrAvQcL1R4FQO+kq2xS/F3zQAt1rqxu4e+JWQjYDmGCK9zeWjJDmakv 2DDeUUezNIA0tjvQy9EUOdybtoKvBlmgTujwCX2qpeyJTll2yxPuWFx8nB7oNGCQ ljoa9YO6mpRgiAQNpnvOeMLtAwa3EjEZLf1XBRRXUPoAvehcPLdL5C3IaxzpmaTY r7qXAPWwMPGIj5pTXdP1mQleZiepdKi3oOWygBjG8nKDqcLjuiMBPaE+S6xjIn4O dseszmeWhOsQgdBr3CpkaqBZrT3NDKcHkaFyThCQCDBIATTEK5LVgGVi9KX3toAe Emov7mOW+xSTJ2CLtbrmmjRm/mJSCXUVPBurD+LTXJnxOmCipTmd0Gt/s8dzPyd0 uaY4XBSypYjUvakFgazuZ13pgDvfbQe329ShRNzM4CAPboy8q/X1W/JDsZvfJqrj oo04TKVxjbg44FjzhbxxBIavq+BUIdJMW4/MCt5YRq5rZPHq5E0TAbZ4tQpmvHUJ I9UZthFWchN/lD2AEteV =QK3s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html