Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Hi, > >Right now we have a mark_param_change callback in the buffer access >functions struct, which should be called whenever the parameters >(length, >bytes per datum) of the buffer change. Each buffer implementation calls >their own mark_param_change callback in their set_length and >set_bytes_per_datum callbacks. Additionally mark_param_change gets >called >when the user changes the buffer length. So in this case it will get >called >twice. > >So I'm wondering if we should make it completely buffer implementation >internal and not export it in the buffer access functions struct, since >the >buffer implementation will probably know best anyway if one of it's >parameters has changed. Makes sense. > >- Lars >-- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in >the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
