2011/11/27 Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:58:41PM +0100, Federico Vaga wrote:
>> In data sabato 26 novembre 2011 12:03:41, Greg KH ha scritto:
>> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 06:30:42PM +0100, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
>> > > +static struct kobj_type zdktype = { /* For standard and extended
>> > > attribute */ + .release = NULL,
>> >
>> > Sweet!
>> >
>> > As-per the in-kernel documentation, I now get to mock you for doing
>> > this :)
>> >
>> > Please NEVER DO THIS, you are ignoring the messages that the kernel
>> > sends you when you remove one of these devices, and causing a memory
>> > leak.
>>
>> Honestly we never see any messages about this.
>
> Really? Then you never removed that kobject from memory. Please go
> read the kobject documentation for more details.
Yes. All the kobjects are correctly removed and no memory leak was found.
I took a look into kobject.c and I found (I suppose) the message but
it is a pr_debug(); if it is so important we can think to "promote" it
to pr_warning()
>> > Not nice at all, yet another reason to use a 'struct device'.
>>
>> I don't think is a valid reason, because device_release implementation require
>> us to implement a release method within device, or device_type or class; so we
>> can use kobj_type as well.
>
> True, but it tries to make things easier to not get wrong, like you are
> here.
>
> Please fix this.
I'll fix it
> greg k-h
>
--
Federico Vaga
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
