On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 02:23:43PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > On 04.11.2024 09:30, Niklas Cassel wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 11:38:53PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > >> pci_intx() should be called by PCI core and some virtualization code > >> only. In PCI device drivers use the appropriate pci_alloc_irq_vectors() > >> call. > > > > Hello Heiner, > > > > as you might or might not know, this patch conflicts with a Philipp's > > already acked patch: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ide/20241015185124.64726-10-pstanner@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > I know, therefore he's on cc. Fully migrating PCI device drivers to the > pci_alloc_irq_vectors() should be done anyway and is the cleaner > alternative to changing pci_intx(). However for some drivers this is a rather > complex task, therefore I understand Philipp's approach to adjust pci_intx() > first. He's incorporating other review feedback in his series, so with the > next re-spin he could remove the ahci patch from his series. Well, if you look at Philipp's patch it: 1) Doesn't only update drivers/ata/ahci.c, it also updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c drivers/ata/pata_rdc.c drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c drivers/ata/sata_sis.c drivers/ata/sata_uli.c drivers/ata/sata_vsc.c Why don't you update the other drivers in drivers/ata/* ? 2) Doesn't just bother to fix a single subsystem (drivers/ata/), it is actually part of a series that fixes all affected subsystems. Why don't you send out this fix as part of a series that fixes all the affected subsystems? Kind regards, Niklas