Re: [PATCH v9 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 7:07 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 26/03/2024 15:49, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 11:19:54AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 26/03/2024 10:18, Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay wrote:

...

> >> A lot of this could have been already merged if you split it... Just
> >> saying...
> >
> > But you able to apply DT schema patches if you wish.
> > Just doing? :-)
>
> Me? Why? DT bindings are supposed to go via subsystem maintainers, not
> DT tree.

Okay, I never remembered this rule, thank you for clarifying.

> Plus, I do not apply any bindings patches, except for managed
> subsystems and none of them are touched here.

Good to know!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux