Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Nope. The correct way to do this would be to define PM operations for the ata > device. However, currently, the scsi_device (scsi_disk) parent is the ata_port, > so to make sure that the PM status of the parent propagates to the child > correctly, we would need to have the scsi_device parent set to the ata_device. > As I said, correcting this is not simple and will involve a significant amount > of changes. Don't you mean the scsi disk's parent is the scsi_target, whose parent is the scsi_host whose parent is the port? But also somehow the scsi disk == the scsi lun?
