On 11/7/23 19:06, Niklas Cassel wrote: > Personally, I think I prefer having the full SHA1 as the first line, > as you directly see that it is a revert (without needing the read to > the end). > > But I think it is fine either way: > Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@xxxxxxx> I tweaked the commit message to keep the full commit ID, making clear it is a "git revert". Thanks. -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
