Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: ata: Add UniPhier controller binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023/02/14 18:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 14/02/2023 10:33, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,

On 2023/02/13 18:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 13/02/2023 05:54, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
Add UniPhier SATA controller compatible string to the platform binding.
This controller needs maximum three reset controls.

Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   .../devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml  | 17 +++++++++++++++++
   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

Changes since v1:
- Restrict resets property changes with compatible strings
- Fix maxItems from two to three

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml
index 7dc2a2e8f598..25dd5ffaa517 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-platform.yaml
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ properties:
                 - marvell,armada-8k-ahci
                 - marvell,berlin2-ahci
                 - marvell,berlin2q-ahci
+              - socionext,uniphier-pro4-ahci
+              - socionext,uniphier-pxs2-ahci
+              - socionext,uniphier-pxs3-ahci
             - const: generic-ahci
         - enum:

Top level is saying reset=1, so did you test your bindings?

Umm, I didn't see any errors on dt_binding_check, anyway I'll add
initial minItems:1 and maxItems:3 on top level first.

You need to test also all DTS using these bindings. Yours and others.
If you tested the DTS (with proper binding, not one which is basically
noop):

uniphier-pro4-ace.dtb: sata@65600000: resets: [[27, 12], [27, 28], [37,
3]] is too long

I've tried updating tools and doing dtbs_check, but I couldn't find this
error. It seems that this error can't be detected unless there is the
specified compatible in "select:".

BTW, the patch has other errors - just look at the beginning of the
file. I cannot see it here in the diff, but when you open the file you
should notice it.

Sorry, but I cannot see anything wrong.
I'll check the header or something...

Thank you,

---
Best Regards
Kunihiko Hayashi



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux