On Saturday 11 February 2023 20:11:06 Sergey Shtylyov wrote: > On 2/11/23 5:42 PM, Ondrej Zary wrote: > > > Only bpck driver uses devtype but it never gets set in pata_parport. > > Remove it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/ata/pata_parport/bpck.c | 2 +- > > include/linux/pata_parport.h | 3 --- > > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_parport/bpck.c b/drivers/ata/pata_parport/bpck.c > > index b9174cf8863c..451a068fe28a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/ata/pata_parport/bpck.c > > +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_parport/bpck.c > > @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static void bpck_connect ( PIA *pi ) > > > > WR(5,8); > > > > - if (pi->devtype == PI_PCD) { > > + if (1 /*pi->devtype == PI_PCD*/) { /* FIXME */ > > WR(0x46,0x10); /* fiddle with ESS logic ??? */ > > Why not drop this entire *if* stmt? I decided to keep it (for now) as a marker of a possible bug. I currently don't have HW to test this driver. > > > WR(0x4c,0x38); > > WR(0x4d,0x88); > [...] > > MBR, Sergey > -- Ondrej Zary