hi John, On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 03:04:06PM +0100, John Garry wrote: > On 17/08/2022 14:51, Oliver Sang wrote: > > Hi Oliver, > > > > v5.19 + 0568e61225 : 512/512 > > > v5.19 + 0568e61225 + 4cbfca5f77 : 512/512 > > > v5.19: 1280/32767 > > > > > > They are want makes sense to me, at least. > > > > > > Oliver, can you confirm this? Thanks! > > I confirm below two: > > v5.19 + 0568e61225 : 512/512 > > v5.19: 1280/32767 (as last already reported) > > ack > > > > > but below failed to build: > > v5.19 + 0568e61225 + 4cbfca5f77 > > > > build_errors: > > - "drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c:242:33: error: implicit declaration of function 'dma_opt_mapping_size'; did you mean 'dma_max_mapping_size'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]" > > - "drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_sas.c:241:24: error: 'struct Scsi_Host' has no member named 'opt_sectors'; did you mean 'max_sectors'?" > > > > not sure if I understand this correctly? > > for this, I just cherry-pick 0568e61225 upon v5.19, > > then cherry-pick 4cbfca5f77 again. > > so my branch looks like: > > > > a11d8b97c3ecb8 v5.19 + 0568e61225 + 4cbfca5f77 > > 1b59440cf71f99 v5.19 + 0568e61225 > > 3d7cb6b04c3f31 (tag: v5.19, > > > > did I do the right thing? > > Sorry but I was not really interested in 4cbfca5f77 and I see where that > build error is coming, but don't be concerned with it. However, for > avoidance of doubt, if you have results for vanilla v6.0-rc1 then that would > be appreciated. for v6.0-rc1, it's still 512/512 > > I will also send a separate patch for testing if you don't mind. sure! we are very glad that we could help. > > thanks, > John >
