On 2022/08/09 2:58, John Garry wrote: > On 08/08/2022 15:52, Damien Le Moal wrote: >> On 2022/08/05 1:05, kernel test robot wrote: >>> >>> >>> Greeting, >>> >>> FYI, we noticed a -15.0% regression of stress-ng.copy-file.ops_per_sec due to commit: >>> >>> >>> commit: 0568e6122574dcc1aded2979cd0245038efe22b6 ("ata: libata-scsi: cap ata_device->max_sectors according to shost->max_sectors") >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master >>> >>> in testcase: stress-ng >>> on test machine: 96 threads 2 sockets Ice Lake with 256G memory >>> with following parameters: >>> >>> nr_threads: 10% >>> disk: 1HDD >>> testtime: 60s >>> fs: f2fs >>> class: filesystem >>> test: copy-file >>> cpufreq_governor: performance >>> ucode: 0xb000280 >> >> Without knowing what the device adapter is, hard to say where the problem is. I >> suspect that with the patch applied, we may be ending up with a small default >> max_sectors value, causing overhead due to more commands than necessary. >> >> Will check what I see with my test rig. > > As far as I can see, this patch should not make a difference unless the > ATA shost driver is setting the max_sectors value unnecessarily low. That is my hunch too, hence my question about which host driver is being used for this test... That is not apparent from the problem report. > >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag >>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> >>> Details are as below: >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> >>> >>> >>> To reproduce: >>> >>> git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git >>> cd lkp-tests >>> sudo bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email >>> bin/lkp split-job --compatible job.yaml # generate the yaml file for lkp run >>> sudo bin/lkp run generated-yaml-file >>> >>> # if come across any failure that blocks the test, >>> # please remove ~/.lkp and /lkp dir to run from a clean state. >>> >>> ========================================================================================= >>> class/compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/fs/kconfig/nr_threads/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/testtime/ucode: >>> filesystem/gcc-11/performance/1HDD/f2fs/x86_64-rhel-8.3/10%/debian-11.1-x86_64-20220510.cgz/lkp-icl-2sp1/copy-file/stress-ng/60s/0xb000280 >>> >>> commit: >>> 4cbfca5f77 ("scsi: scsi_transport_sas: cap shost opt_sectors according to DMA optimal limit") >>> 0568e61225 ("ata: libata-scsi: cap ata_device->max_sectors according to shost->max_sectors") >>> >>> 4cbfca5f7750520f 0568e6122574dcc1aded2979cd0 >>> ---------------- --------------------------- >>> %stddev %change %stddev >>> \ | \ >>> 1627 -14.9% 1385 stress-ng.copy-file.ops >>> 27.01 -15.0% 22.96 stress-ng.copy-file.ops_per_sec >>> 8935079 -11.9% 7870629 stress-ng.time.file_system_outputs >>> 14.88 ± 5% -31.8% 10.14 ± 3% stress-ng.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got >>> 50912 -14.7% 43413 vmstat.io.bo >>> 93.78 +1.4% 95.10 iostat.cpu.idle >>> 3.89 -31.6% 2.66 iostat.cpu.iowait >>> 4.01 -1.3 2.74 mpstat.cpu.all.iowait% >>> 0.23 ± 9% -0.1 0.17 ± 11% mpstat.cpu.all.sys% >>> 1.66 ± 37% -1.2 0.51 ± 55% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.f2fs_write_end.generic_perform_write.f2fs_buffered_write_iter.f2fs_file_write_iter.do_iter_readv_writev >>> 1.66 ± 37% -1.1 0.59 ± 25% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.f2fs_write_end >>> 1.51 ± 40% -1.1 0.45 ± 26% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.f2fs_dirty_data_folio >>> 1.21 ± 49% -1.0 0.23 ± 33% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.f2fs_update_dirty_folio >>> 0.88 ± 56% -0.8 0.04 ±111% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath >>> 0.14 ± 26% +0.1 0.25 ± 28% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.page_cache_ra_unbounded >>> 0.88 ± 56% -0.8 0.04 ±112% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath >>> 3164876 ± 9% -20.2% 2524713 ± 7% perf-stat.i.cache-misses >>> 4.087e+08 -4.6% 3.899e+08 perf-stat.i.dTLB-loads >>> 313050 ± 10% -18.4% 255410 ± 6% perf-stat.i.node-loads >>> 972573 ± 9% -16.4% 812873 ± 6% perf-stat.i.node-stores >>> 3114748 ± 9% -20.2% 2484807 ± 7% perf-stat.ps.cache-misses >>> 4.022e+08 -4.6% 3.837e+08 perf-stat.ps.dTLB-loads >>> 308178 ± 10% -18.4% 251418 ± 6% perf-stat.ps.node-loads >>> 956996 ± 9% -16.4% 799948 ± 6% perf-stat.ps.node-stores >>> 358486 -8.3% 328694 proc-vmstat.nr_active_file >>> 1121620 -11.9% 987816 proc-vmstat.nr_dirtied >>> 179906 -6.7% 167912 proc-vmstat.nr_dirty >>> 1151201 -1.7% 1131322 proc-vmstat.nr_file_pages >>> 100181 +9.9% 110078 ± 2% proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_file >>> 846362 -14.6% 722471 proc-vmstat.nr_written >>> 358486 -8.3% 328694 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_active_file >>> 100181 +9.9% 110078 ± 2% proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_file >>> 180668 -6.8% 168456 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_write_pending >>> 556469 -3.5% 536985 proc-vmstat.pgactivate >>> 3385454 -14.6% 2889953 proc-vmstat.pgpgout >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Disclaimer: >>> Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided >>> for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software >>> design or configuration may affect actual performance. >>> >>> >> >> > -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research