On 6/8/22 9:44 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> The PATA transfer mode masks (direct and packed) in libata are sometimes
>> declared as *unsigned int* and sometimes as *unsigned long* (which is a
>> 64-bit type on 64-bit architectures), while the packed mask really only
>> uses 20 bits and the PIO/MWDMA/UDMA masks use up to 8 bits. Switching to
>> the uniform 32-bit masks saves siginificant amount of the object code...
>>
>> Sergey Shtylyov (3):
>> ata: make packed transfer mode masks *unsigned int*
>> ata: make ata_device::{pio|mwdma|udma}_mask *unsigned int*
>> ata: make ata_port_info::{pio|mwdma|udma}_mask *unsigned int*
>>
>> drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 8 +++---
>> drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 38 +++++++++++++-------------
>> drivers/ata/pata_acpi.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/ata/pata_ali.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/ata/pata_amd.c | 14 +++++-----
>> drivers/ata/pata_hpt366.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/ata/pata_hpt37x.c | 6 ++---
>> drivers/ata/pata_hpt3x2n.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c | 4 +--
>> drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c | 4 +--
>> drivers/ata/pata_sis.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/ata/pata_via.c | 2 +-
>> include/linux/libata.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>> 13 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Are you going to resend this as a single patch ?
No, I'd like to avoid that... Please merge as is.
MBR, Sergey
