On 5/9/22 05:41, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> The PATA transfer mode masks (direct and packed) in libata are sometimes
> declared as *unsigned int* and sometimes as *unsigned long* (which is a
> 64-bit type on 64-bit architectures), while the packed mask really only
> uses 20 bits and the PIO/MWDMA/UDMA masks use up to 8 bits. Switching to
> the uniform 32-bit masks saves siginificant amount of the object code...
>
> Sergey Shtylyov (3):
> ata: make packed transfer mode masks *unsigned int*
> ata: make ata_device::{pio|mwdma|udma}_mask *unsigned int*
> ata: make ata_port_info::{pio|mwdma|udma}_mask *unsigned int*
>
> drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 8 +++---
> drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 38 +++++++++++++-------------
> drivers/ata/pata_acpi.c | 2 +-
> drivers/ata/pata_ali.c | 2 +-
> drivers/ata/pata_amd.c | 14 +++++-----
> drivers/ata/pata_hpt366.c | 2 +-
> drivers/ata/pata_hpt37x.c | 6 ++---
> drivers/ata/pata_hpt3x2n.c | 2 +-
> drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c | 4 +--
> drivers/ata/pata_serverworks.c | 4 +--
> drivers/ata/pata_sis.c | 2 +-
> drivers/ata/pata_via.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/libata.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 13 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
>
Are you going to resend this as a single patch ?
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
