Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ata: libata-sff: refactor ata_sff_altstatus()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/19/22 07:58, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2/18/22 01:02, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
>> On 2/17/22 3:12 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>
>>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Sergey-Shtylyov/Refactor-the-accessors-for-the-ATA-device-control-and-alternate-status-registers/20220213-231119
>>> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git b81b1829e7e39f6cebdf6e4d5484eacbceda8554
>>> config: riscv-randconfig-m031-20220213 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220214/202202141714.X7UdMJUj-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
>>> compiler: riscv32-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
>>>
>>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> smatch warnings:
>>> drivers/ata/libata-sff.c:1652 ata_sff_lost_interrupt() error: uninitialized symbol 'status'.
>>>
>>> vim +/status +1652 drivers/ata/libata-sff.c
>>>
>>> c96f1732e25362 Alan Cox        2009-03-24  1635  void ata_sff_lost_interrupt(struct ata_port *ap)
>>> c96f1732e25362 Alan Cox        2009-03-24  1636  {
>>> c96f1732e25362 Alan Cox        2009-03-24  1637  	u8 status;
>>> c96f1732e25362 Alan Cox        2009-03-24  1638  	struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
>>> c96f1732e25362 Alan Cox        2009-03-24  1639  
>>> c96f1732e25362 Alan Cox        2009-03-24  1640  	/* Only one outstanding command per SFF channel */
>>> c96f1732e25362 Alan Cox        2009-03-24  1641  	qc = ata_qc_from_tag(ap, ap->link.active_tag);
>>> 3e4ec3443f70fb Tejun Heo       2010-05-10  1642  	/* We cannot lose an interrupt on a non-existent or polled command */
>>> 3e4ec3443f70fb Tejun Heo       2010-05-10  1643  	if (!qc || qc->tf.flags & ATA_TFLAG_POLLING)
>>> c96f1732e25362 Alan Cox        2009-03-24  1644  		return;
>>> c96f1732e25362 Alan Cox        2009-03-24  1645  	/* See if the controller thinks it is still busy - if so the command
>>> c96f1732e25362 Alan Cox        2009-03-24  1646  	   isn't a lost IRQ but is still in progress */
>>> 57232468aca7de Sergey Shtylyov 2022-02-13  1647  	if (ata_sff_altstatus(ap, &status) && (status & ATA_BUSY))
>>>
>>> "status" is not intialized if ata_sff_altstatus() return false.
>>
>>    Hmm, inaccurate coding on my side, will fix it, thanks!
>>
>>> c96f1732e25362 Alan Cox        2009-03-24  1648  		return;
>>> c96f1732e25362 Alan Cox        2009-03-24  1649  
>>> c96f1732e25362 Alan Cox        2009-03-24  1650  	/* There was a command running, we are no longer busy and we have
>>> c96f1732e25362 Alan Cox        2009-03-24  1651  	   no interrupt. */
>>> a9a79dfec23956 Joe Perches     2011-04-15 @1652  	ata_port_warn(ap, "lost interrupt (Status 0x%x)\n",
>>> c96f1732e25362 Alan Cox        2009-03-24  1653  								status);
>>>                                                                                                                 ^^^^^^
>>> Uninitalized.  Also the indenting is unfortunate.
>>
>>    Not my fault but I'll fix this as well... :-)
> 
> Did you send a fix ? I did not see anything in my inbox...

Ignore. Got it :)

> 
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> MBR, Sergey
> 
> 


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux