On 1/5/21 1:22 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 12/23/20 4:05 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> >> >> On 12/16/2020 1:41 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote: >>> v3 -- discard commit from v2; instead rely on the new function >>> reset_control_rearm provided in a recent commit [1] applied >>> to reset/next. >>> -- New commit to correct pcie-brcmstb.c usage of a reset controller >>> to use reset/rearm verses deassert/assert. >>> >>> v2 -- refactor rescal-reset driver to implement assert/deassert rather than >>> reset because the reset call only fires once per lifetime and we need >>> to reset after every resume from S2 or S3. >>> -- Split the use of "ahci" and "rescal" controllers in separate fields >>> to keep things simple. >>> >>> v1 -- original >>> >>> >>> [1] Applied commit "reset: make shared pulsed reset controls re-triggerable" >>> found at git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git >>> branch reset/shared-retrigger >> >> The changes in that branch above have now landed in Linus' tree with: >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=557acb3d2cd9c82de19f944f6cc967a347735385 >> >> It would be good if we could get both patches applied via the same tree >> or within the same cycle to avoid having either PCIe or SATA broken on >> these platforms. > > Ping? Can someone apply those patches if you are happy with them? Thank you. Ping? Can we review and ideally also apply these patches? Thanks -- Florian
