On 12/23/20 4:05 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > On 12/16/2020 1:41 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote: >> v3 -- discard commit from v2; instead rely on the new function >> reset_control_rearm provided in a recent commit [1] applied >> to reset/next. >> -- New commit to correct pcie-brcmstb.c usage of a reset controller >> to use reset/rearm verses deassert/assert. >> >> v2 -- refactor rescal-reset driver to implement assert/deassert rather than >> reset because the reset call only fires once per lifetime and we need >> to reset after every resume from S2 or S3. >> -- Split the use of "ahci" and "rescal" controllers in separate fields >> to keep things simple. >> >> v1 -- original >> >> >> [1] Applied commit "reset: make shared pulsed reset controls re-triggerable" >> found at git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git >> branch reset/shared-retrigger > > The changes in that branch above have now landed in Linus' tree with: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=557acb3d2cd9c82de19f944f6cc967a347735385 > > It would be good if we could get both patches applied via the same tree > or within the same cycle to avoid having either PCIe or SATA broken on > these platforms. Ping? Can someone apply those patches if you are happy with them? Thank you. -- Florian
