Re: [PATCH V8 5/5] libata: Align DMA buffer to dma_get_cache_alignment()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>     This function is called only for the PIO mode commands, so I doubt this is 
> necessary...

That is true but there are platforms out there that issue disk level PIO
commands via DMA (or can do so). Indeed the Cyrix MediaGX could do that
in the 1990s but I never add support 8)

So I think it makes sense to allocate the buffers DMA aligned, but it
doesn't seem to explain the situation in this case and I think it would
be helpful to know what platform and ATA driver is tripping this and wny
they are the only people in the universe to have the problem.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux