Re: [PATCH 6/6] sd: add support for TCG OPAL self encrypting disks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christoph,

>> But as we already set no_report_opcodes for all usb-storage and
>> quirked uas devices I think the worst offenders are already covered
>> anyway.
>
> Martin, how do we want to move ahead on this patch?

I was suggesting the VPD because that may be easier for the SAS HBA
vendors to accommodate for SATA passthrough. But we can cross that
bridge when we get to it.

For libata I'm fine with keying off a supports_opal:1 flag in
scsi_device or something to that effect. I'd just like to reduce the
risk of introducing more RSOC regressions.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux