On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 15:26 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > What issue? You are allowed to have overlapping memory resources. > > > > Exactly, and then the question why did you do a revert? > > Because we are at -rc2. No, my point is that (repeating myself) revert just *hides* the actual issue. Yes, I understand that it's a quick fix, and it should not be considered as best solution. > We need a quick fix now, so that my NAS box > disks start spinning again. You can then spend some time to consider a > better fix, and get it merged in the 4.13 merge window. > > Please feel free to Cc: me and the other Marvell maintainers on > patches, so we can test them. I'm not going to do that since I have no such issue, no possibility to test and actually choose best strategy with your hardware. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
