Hello, On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:08:52AM +0100, Darren Stevens wrote: > What would you prefer the commit message to say? I was only explaining why the > patch was needed. Oh, I want it to explain why it matters to mark the unused port dummy. It does reduce the probing time, right? > I need to fix formatting anyway, as Sergei has pointed out, so either I rework > this or you revert as originally planned and I'll resubmit the original patch > for the SB600 only, whichever works best for you, I'm aware time is an issue > here. Can you please generate the patch on top of the following branch? git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/libata.git for-4.11-fixes The revert was days ago, so I don't wanna replace it at this point. Let's just do an incremnetal patch on top. > I didn't include Markku as I'm not sure I should be adding people to the > Commit without their express permission. I see. I sometimes try to get permission if the person only wrote off list but once things are on the mailing list I don't think there's anything to worry about. Just cc them. > I'm still quite new at this so sorry for causing all this trouble. No worries. You're doing great. :) Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
