Hello, On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:50:43PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > +static struct ata_port_operations pcmcia_ebsa110_port_ops = { > + .inherits = &ata_sff_port_ops, > + .sff_dev_select = pmcmia_ebsa110_dev_select, ^^^^^^ > + .sff_set_devctl = pcmcia_ebsa110_set_devctl, > + .sff_check_status = pcmcia_ebsa110_check_status, > + .sff_check_altstatus = pcmcia_ebsa110_check_altstatus, > + .sff_tf_load = pcmcia_ebsa110_tf_load, > + .sff_tf_read = pcmcia_ebsa110_tf_read, > + .sff_exec_command = pcmcia_ebsa110_exec_command, > + .sff_data_xfer = ata_sff_data_xfer_noirq, > + .softreset = pata_pcmcia_ebsa110_softreset, > + .cable_detect = ata_cable_40wire, > + .set_mode = pcmcia_set_mode, > +}; Heh, that's a fat driver for a sff device. I suppose this is mostly copied from the matching ide driver but it'd be nice to explain why it needs duplicate most standard functions. Is it because PCMCIA assigned address doesn't fall under the usual read/io boundary on the arch? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html