Re: [PATCH 2/2] ide-generic: added messages in case of PCI IDE devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, February 21, 2017 09:38:31 PM Luiz Carlos Ramos wrote:
> Hello, Sergei!
> 
> I have a question or two about checkpatch.pl results below.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 06:52:13PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > On 02/21/2017 05:22 PM, Luiz Carlos Ramos wrote:
> > 
> > >Two messages are now displayed (at "warn" level) to make sure the user
> > >is aware that PCI IDE devices were detected at common addresses (0x1f0
> > >and 0x170) and that they will not be managed by ide-generic, but rather
> > >delegated to its specific driver.
> > >
> > >Signed-off-by: Luiz Carlos Ramos <lramos.prof@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >---
> > > drivers/ide/ide-generic.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > >
> > >diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-generic.c b/drivers/ide/ide-generic.c
> > >index ee11edcdba3170c077381d603918498d79ffa3bb..2204819ef73612deed4ebfe58c69cdadb40fa53b 100644
> > >--- a/drivers/ide/ide-generic.c
> > >+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-generic.c
> > >@@ -125,9 +125,19 @@ static int __init ide_generic_init(void)
> > >
> > > 		if (primary == 0)
> > > 			probe_mask |= 0x1;
> > >+		else {
> > >+			printk(KERN_WARN DRV_NAME ": PCI IDE device detected at 0x%4.4x."
> > 
> >    Also, please use pr_warn().
> > 
> 
> This code is quite old, and it is in deep maintenance phase.
> 
> Every other message in ide-generic.c is implemented as printk(...),
> but to be fair, there are not so many of them.
> 
> Given that fact, would it be better to change these two ones to be
> inserted to pr_warn() as suggested (and then having a mix of printk()
> and pr_warn() in the code), or to "allow" two more printk() in the code
> and having checkpatck.pl complaining?
> 
> I really don't know what is better or worse. Both can be implemented,
> and there are a mix of advantages and disadvantages in each side.
> 
> I'd like to hear from you and colleagues about how to proceed.

Well, I vote for allowing two more printk() and leaving
the old code as it is.

> > >+			     " ide-generic will not grab this device, delegating it to"
> > >+			     " the driver of its specific chipset\n", 0x1f0);
> > >+		}
> > >
> > > 		if (secondary == 0)
> > > 			probe_mask |= 0x2;
> > >+		else {
> > >+			printk(KERN_WARN DRV_NAME ": PCI IDE device detected at 0x%4.4x."
> > 
> >    Likewise.
> > 
> > >+			     " ide-generic will not grab this device, delegating it to"
> > >+			     " the driver of its specific chipset\n", 0x170);
> > >+		}
> > > 	} else
> > > 		printk(KERN_INFO DRV_NAME ": enforcing probing of I/O ports "
> > > 			"upon user request\n");
> > 
> > MBR, Sergei
> > 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Luiz Carlos Ramos

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux