Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:40:19PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> There are two more that annoy me, but I don't know how to fix them:
> 
> ata_scsi_rbuf                                  -    4096   +4096
> ata_force_param_buf                            -    4096   +4096

ata_force_param_buf is __initdata and shouldn't really matter.
ata_scsi_rbuf, hmmm, idk.  Maybe we can allocate it dynamically when
registering the first ATA device so that systems w/o them can avoid
the wastage.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux