Hello, On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 03:43:32AM +0000, Adam Manzanares wrote: > I prefer having the feature conditional so you can use the CFQ > scheduler with I/O priorities as is. If you decide to enable the > feature then the priorities will be passed down to the drive in > addition to the work that the CFQ scheduler does. Since this feature > may change the user perceived performance of the device I want to > make sure they know what they are getting into. Yeah, I prefer to have it behind an explicit flag given the history of optional ATA features. The feature is unlikely to matter to a lot of people and is almost bound to break existing RT prio usages. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
