On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 12:36:37PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci.c b/drivers/ata/libahci.c > > index 7461a58..dcf2c72 100644 > > --- a/drivers/ata/libahci.c > > +++ b/drivers/ata/libahci.c > > @@ -2524,7 +2524,7 @@ static int ahci_host_activate_multi_irqs(struct ata_host *host, > > > > /* Do not receive interrupts sent by dummy ports */ > > if (!pp) { > > - disable_irq(irq + i); > > + disable_irq(irq); > > continue; > > } > > I'm not following. The driver at that point has irqs in the range > [@irq, @irq + @host->n_ports - 1] and is trying to activate them and > the above code block disables irq for a port which should be skipped. > Why wouldn't it need to be indexed? Because ahci_irq_vector does that indexing already. This call changed when Dan added ahci_irq_vector to support the MSI-X case - since then ahci_irq_vector either does the base irq + index logic for MSI or uses the msix_entries array for MSI-X, and irq contains the result of that operation. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html