Hello, (Can you please flow the text a bit below 80 column when you reply?) On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:51:47AM +0000, Pang Raymond wrote: > Why does the phenomenon appear? > Two factors cause this problem. > 1. In MSIx's irq handler > (ahci_multi_irqs_intr_hard()), we do not clear > GHC.IS register which presents which ports need > interrupt service. static irqreturn_t > ahci_multi_irqs_intr_hard(int irq, void > *dev_instance) > { > // omitting unconcerned codes here > // ... > // here we just clear PxIS register, not clear GHC.IS > status = readl(port_mmio + PORT_IRQ_STAT); > writel(status, port_mmio + PORT_IRQ_STAT); > // ... > } > 2. In PCI subsystem, after Disable MSIx, INTx is > enabled automatically. > void pci_msix_shutdown(struct pci_dev *dev) > { > // omitting unconcerned codes here > // ... > // after Disable MSIx, enable INTx imediately > pci_msix_clear_and_set_ctrl(dev, PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_ENABLE, 0); > pci_intx_for_msi(dev, 1); > dev->msix_enabled = 0; > pcibios_alloc_irq(dev); > } > > When Kernel enables INTx(I mean clearing PCI configure space > Rx04.bit10), controller will find GHC.IS is not Zero (because driver > haven't cleared GHC.IS after servicing MSIx interrupt), so it > believes some SATA ports need interrupt servicing and asserts INTx > interrupt. Looks like you debugged the problem. Care to write up and test a patch? Thanks a lot! -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html