On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:13:59AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 04:00:08PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: >> >>> Hello, Andy. >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 03:22:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> >>> > Tejun, since Vinod applied all necessary patches into his tree, the >> >>> > series now has just a dependency to whatever branch / tag he marks for >> >>> > it. >> >>> > Do we have a chance to see the SATA series be applied in your tree? >> >>> >> >>> Applied 1-22 to libata/for-4.7. There was a couple trivial conflicts >> >>> which I resolved while applying but it'd be great if you can check >> >>> whether everything looks okay. >> >>> >> >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tj/libata.git/log/?h=for-4.7 >> >> >> >> Oops, build failure. Reverted for now. >> > >> > I suppose you have to pull material from Vinod. >> >> The failure the build bot reported is due to the DMA patches not being >> in the tree. > > Which tree should I pull? slave-dma [1], branch topic/dw. But I think Vinod can tell us which tag/branch will be immutable. Vinod? [1] http://git.infradead.org/users/vkoul/slave-dma.git -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
