From: Andy Shevchenko > Sent: 21 April 2016 19:15 > ata_sff_qc_issue() can't handle DMA commands and thus we have to avoid it for > them. Do call ata_bmdma_qc_issue() instead for this case. > > Suggested-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c > index 038e5fb..845c35d 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c > @@ -1061,10 +1061,12 @@ static unsigned int sata_dwc_qc_issue(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) > __func__, tag, qc->ap->link.sactive, sactive); > > ap->ops->sff_tf_load(ap, &qc->tf); > - sata_dwc_exec_command_by_tag(ap, &qc->tf, qc->tag, > + sata_dwc_exec_command_by_tag(ap, &qc->tf, tag, > SATA_DWC_CMD_ISSUED_PEND); > + } else if (ata_is_dma(qc->tf.protocol)) { > + return ata_bmdma_qc_issue(qc); > } else { > - ata_sff_qc_issue(qc); > + return ata_sff_qc_issue(qc); > } > return 0; > } I'd nuke those 'else if', they make it very hard to read. I Think the code is: sata_dwc_exec_command_by_tag(...); return 0; } if (ata_is_dma(qc->tf.protocol)) return ata_bmdma_qc_issue(qc); return ata_sff_qc_issue(qc); } David ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��'^�)��jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥