On 03/02/16 13:41, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 03 February 2016 13:24:10 Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:Bitfields for both endians are used and handled by mips. Mainly used by cavium. As this is a cavium driver, would it be acceptable? Or should I replace with the following. v = cvmx_read_csr((uint64_t)base + CVMX_SATA_UCTL_SHIM_CFG); v &= ~(SATA_UCTL_ENDIAN_MODE_E_MASK << DMA_ENDIAN_MODE); v &= ~(SATA_UCTL_ENDIAN_MODE_E_MASK << CSR_ENDIAN_MODE); #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN v |= SATA_UCTL_ENDIAN_MODE_E_BIG << DMA_ENDIAN_MODE; v |= SATA_UCTL_ENDIAN_MODE_E_BIG << CSR_ENDIAN_MODE; #else v |= SATA_UCTL_ENDIAN_MODE_E_LITTLE << DMA_ENDIAN_MODE; v |= SATA_UCTL_ENDIAN_MODE_E_LITTLE << CSR_ENDIAN_MODE; #endif v |= 1 << DMA_READ_CMD; cvmx_write_csr((uint64_t)base + CVMX_SATA_UCTL_SHIM_CFG, v);I think something like this would be more conventional, yes. Or maybe define the macros so you don't have to do the shift everywhere: v &= ~SATA_UCTL_ENDIAN_MODE_E_MASK | SATA_UCTL_ENDIAN_MODE | SATA_UCTL_DMA_READ_CMD;
Sure. Thanks ZubairLK
Arnd
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
