Re: [PATCH] libata: add support for NCQ commands for SG interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:39:32AM +0530, Vinayak Kale wrote:
...
> > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> > index 0d7f0da..5b0a5ab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> > @@ -2914,12 +2914,14 @@ ata_scsi_map_proto(u8 byte1)
> >         case 5:         /* PIO Data-out */
> >                 return ATA_PROT_PIO;
> >
> > +       case 12:        /* FPDMA */
> > +               return ATA_PROT_NCQ;
> > +
> >         case 0:         /* Hard Reset */
> >         case 1:         /* SRST */
> >         case 8:         /* Device Diagnostic */
> >         case 9:         /* Device Reset */
> >         case 7:         /* DMA Queued */
> > -       case 12:        /* FPDMA */
> >         case 15:        /* Return Response Info */
> >         default:        /* Reserved */
> >                 break;
> > @@ -2963,7 +2965,7 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsi_pass_thru(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> >                         tf->hob_lbal = cdb[7];
> >                         tf->hob_lbam = cdb[9];
> >                         tf->hob_lbah = cdb[11];
> > -                       tf->flags |= ATA_TFLAG_LBA48;
> > +                       tf->flags |= (ATA_TFLAG_LBA48 | ATA_TFLAG_LBA);
> >                 } else
> >                         tf->flags &= ~ATA_TFLAG_LBA48;
> >
> > @@ -2992,6 +2994,10 @@ static unsigned int ata_scsi_pass_thru(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
> >                 tf->command = cdb[9];
> >         }
> >
> > +       /* For NCQ commands with FPDMA protocol, copy the tag value */
> > +       if (tf->protocol == ATA_PROT_NCQ)
> > +               tf->nsect = qc->tag << 3;
> > +
> >         /* enforce correct master/slave bit */
> >         tf->device = dev->devno ?
> >                 tf->device | ATA_DEV1 : tf->device & ~ATA_DEV1;
>
> Any comments on this?

It looks like it'd work given that it's forcing qc->tag into
tf->nsect.  What's the use case tho?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux