Hello, James. On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:44:06AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > I'm not arguing that *this* patch is the best way to do it. You asked > *why* autosense and that's what I answered. I think there's time to Heh, that was mostly me being confused. I was thinking NCQ autosense was the only way ATA devices would report sense data. > work out the implementation details to get them to be correct and well > structured. Yeah, definitely. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
