Adding a bit. On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:04:28AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Ugh... so this is from NCQ autosense thing. Now ATA devices reports > sense data too which trumps AC_ERR_DEV so libata EH decides to retry > even when the device indicates unrecoverable error. Urgh... we > shouldn't be taking completely different error handling paths because > a device chooses to report error conditions slightly differently. > Please map them so that they behave in a consistent manner. I'm gonna > plug autosense for now. Also, is there anything substantial we gain from NCQ autosense? Why do we want this in the first place? ATA error reporting is rudimentary but it more or less works and I'm not sure whether we'd want to overhaul its basic behaviors at this stage. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
