On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 04:10:30PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 09/29/2014 04:06 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:59:02PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > >> libata already uses an internal buffer, so we should be using > >> __scsi_print_command() here. > >> > >> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> > > > > Applied to libata/for-3.18. > > > > Thanks. > > > Errm. > Nice that you did, but it sort of relies for patches 01-32 to be > applied previously. > I'd rather apply your Signed-off-by: to the patch and have it > routed through the SCSI tree; that way we're sure it'll only be > applied if the previous patches are in. > > Can you please pull it from libata to avoid build issues? Ah, okay, pulled it. Please feel free to add Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
