Re: [PATCH 33/38] libata: use __scsi_print_command()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/29/2014 04:06 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 01:59:02PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> libata already uses an internal buffer, so we should be using
>> __scsi_print_command() here.
>>
>> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Applied to libata/for-3.18.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
Errm.
Nice that you did, but it sort of relies for patches 01-32 to be
applied previously.
I'd rather apply your Signed-off-by: to the patch and have it
routed through the SCSI tree; that way we're sure it'll only be
applied if the previous patches are in.

Can you please pull it from libata to avoid build issues?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux