On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:18:11AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 05/20/2014 11:04 AM, Antoine Ténart wrote: > >The Marvell Berlin AHCI has all his specific in the PHY driver. It then > >only need to use the libahci functions to work properly. > > If it is that generic, .. > > >Add its compatible into the libahci_platform driver. > > > >Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >--- > > drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > >diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c > >index ef67e79944f9..bc050aabf206 100644 > >--- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c > >+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c > >@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = { > > { .compatible = "snps,exynos5440-ahci", }, > > { .compatible = "ibm,476gtr-ahci", }, > > { .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", }, > >+ { .compatible = "marvell,berlin-ahci", }, > > .. why have a Marvell-specific compatible? Well, the 3 other compatibles seemed as generic as the marvell one. Just following what was done before here. > How about "generic-ahci" instead, like we have for other fooHCIs > already? That would avoid an endless list of compatibles :) Antoine -- Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html