On 05/20/2014 11:04 AM, Antoine Ténart wrote:
The Marvell Berlin AHCI has all his specific in the PHY driver. It then
only need to use the libahci functions to work properly.
If it is that generic, ..
Add its compatible into the libahci_platform driver.
Signed-off-by: Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
index ef67e79944f9..bc050aabf206 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_platform.c
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ahci_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "snps,exynos5440-ahci", },
{ .compatible = "ibm,476gtr-ahci", },
{ .compatible = "snps,dwc-ahci", },
+ { .compatible = "marvell,berlin-ahci", },
.. why have a Marvell-specific compatible?
How about "generic-ahci" instead, like we have for other fooHCIs
already?
Sebastian
{},
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ahci_of_match);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
