Re: [PATCH] Quirk for buggy dma source tags with Intel IOMMU.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:35 AM, George Spelvin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm looking over the bug reports, and I'm trying to understand why you
> need two mechanisms.  You have one table (pci_dev_dma_source_map)
> that maps one devfn to a secondary one, and a second table
> (pci_dev_dma_multi_source_map) that gives a 2-bit bitmap of function
> numbers.
I haven't found a simple way to combine the two maps that still makes
the two distinct problems apparent.
pci_dev_dma_multi_source_map deals with devices that use multiple
functions, but the correct device number.
pci_dev_dma_source_map deals with devices that use a single incorrect
devfn that's mangled in both device and function numbers.

> But as I understand it, all the Marvell devices listed there always have
> a devfn of 00.0, so you could just move them to the first table with a
> mapping to 00.1.
>
> If they also have device/function 00.1 using a requester ID of 00.0
> you could add a second entry.
>
> The only time you'd need a bitmap would be if the device ended up on
> function 2 or higher and still used functions 0 and 1 in request IDs.

Sure, that sounds reasonable and certainly needs to be considered, but
since there's no complete record of what devices get this wrong and
how they get this wrong, I wanted to
* show all requester ids are used for each device in a concise entry,
* build up as much of a record of this problem as possible (hence the
comments and bug references),
* make it easy to see the general problem and have this discussion,
* not make assumptions about which functions would be visible and
which requester ids are actually used (like a device showing up at
00.0 that uses 00.1 and 00.2 only).

Who knows what will show up when iommu is turned on by default again.

> Now, unfortunately this does not cover the phantom functions case, but
> that could be done with separate code.
>
>
> The other question is when to do the lookup.  I don't know how often
> IOMMU mapping is done, and if linear search through a list of PCI devices
> would be a performance problem.  It would be nicer to have a standard
> PCI fixup done once which sets a flag in the pci_dev to either note the
> actual secondary devfn, or set a flag to trigger the secondary lookup
> only on the devices that need it.

Yes, I'd also like to hear what the gatekeepers think about this.

Thanks,

a.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux