Hi Mark, On Monday 20 January 2014 09:31:19 Mark Rutland wrote: > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 08:16:42PM +0000, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Friday 17 January 2014 02:07:42 Valentine Barshak wrote: > > > Now that the clocks are available in the R-Car Gen2 DT, > > > add clocks property description to the sata_rcar bindings. > > > The clocks have been tested on r8a7791 so we use that > > > as an example of the R-Car SATA node. > > > > > > The patch is against for-next branch of the libata git repo. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <valentine.barshak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt | 10 ++++++---- > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt index > > > 1e61113..6da60c0 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt > > > > > > @@ -7,12 +7,14 @@ Required properties: > > > - "renesas,sata-r8a7791" for R-Car M2 > > > - reg : address and length of the SATA registers; > > > - interrupts : must consist of one interrupt specifier. > > > +- clocks : must contain a phandle and clock-specifier pair. > > > > I would say "must contain a reference to the functional clock.", as the > > clock could be referenced by a phandle only depending on the SATA IP core > > integration in the SoC. > > In that case the clock-specifier is simply zero cells (though admittedly > a pair including a zero-cells element is a bit odd). > > The wording in the patch is consistent with the form I've been > recommending elsewhere: > > - clocks: A list of phandles + clock-specifier pairs, one for each > entry in clock-names. > - clock-names: Should contain: > * "fclk" - the functional clock > * "other_clk" - some other clock. > > > Wouldn't it be time to have standard wordings for clocks (and interrupt) > > bindings ? > > I would certainly like to see consistent wording across bindings > (especially for interrupts given the addition of the interrupts-extended > binding). What about creating a new file in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ with reference wordings for common properties ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
