On Friday 03 January 2014, Loc Ho wrote: > + sata23clk: sata23clk@1f22c000 { > + compatible = "apm,xgene-device-clock"; > + #clock-cells = <1>; > + clocks = <&socplldiv2 0>; > + clock-names = "sata23clk"; > + }; > + > + sata45clk: sata45clk@1f23c000 { > + compatible = "apm,xgene-device-clock"; > + #clock-cells = <1>; > + clocks = <&socplldiv2 0>; > + clock-names = "sata45clk"; Something is wrong here: You have two devices with the same "compatible" string but using different "clock-names" strings. The binding document lists this as an optional property with the description "shall be the name of the device clock. If missing, use the device name", which doesn't seem to make any sense. Please fix the binding and the existing users of this, and don't introduce any more broken instances. Since each device clock is documented to have only one parent anyway, please just make it an anonymous clock. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html