On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 09:57:09 AM Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 25 Dec 2013, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 04:55:46 PM Alan Stern wrote: > > > On Tue, 24 Dec 2013, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, Linus. > > > > > > > > libata fixes for v3.13-rc5. There's one interseting commit - "libata, > > > > freezer: avoid block device removal while system is frozen". It's an > > > > ugly hack working around a deadlock condition between driver core > > > > resume and block layer device removal paths through freezer which was > > > > made more reproducible by writeback being converted to workqueue some > > > > releases ago. The bug has nothing to do with libata but it's just an > > > > workaround which is easy to backport. After discussion, Rafael and I > > > > seem to agree that we don't really need kernel freezables - both > > > > kthread and workqueue. There are few specific workqueues which > > > > constitute PM operations and require freezing, which will be converted > > > > to use workqueue_set_max_active() instead. All other kernel freezer > > > > uses are planned to be removed, followed by the removal of kthread and > > > > workqueue freezer support, hopefully. > > > > > > Wait a minute. I don't recall anybody mentioning this earlier. What > > > about khubd? There isn't any plan to remove _it_. > > > > No, but we are going to replace the freezing of kernel stuff with something > > more direct, like "suspend" routines called from the system suspend code path > > and causing things to stop (and corresponding "resume" starting them again). > > Is this discussed in more detail somewhere (an email thread, for > example)? This one, more or less: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/13/402 Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
