On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:36:55PM +0100, Levente Kurusa wrote: > >1. > >Countering your nodisable comment, would it be valid to do: > >libata.force=2:disable libata.force=2.02:nodisable > >To disable all of port 2 except device 2? > > I think that makes sense and I support having 'nodisable'. I really don't want to. Let's please add whatever is necessary for fringe use cases but no more. It's not like this thing is generally useful. > >2. One of my friends wondered if it would be worthwhile to add force > >keywords for other HORKAGE bits, and if so, should the > >ata_lflag/ata_link force bits also be presented? > > I don't think so. Most of the other HORKAGEs are automatically > recognized and applied by the code. I think the only ones > which can cause trouble if not detected at first are the ones that are > currently in the list. Again, just whatever is immediately necessary, please. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
