On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 02:35:23PM +0400, Valentine wrote: > On 10/31/2013 10:01 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > >On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:14:21PM +0400, Valentine Barshak wrote: > >>R-Car Gen2 SoCs have a different PHY which is not compatible > >>with the older R-Car H1 (R8A7779) version. > >>This adds OF/platform device id tables and PHY initialization > >>callbacks for the following Gen2 SoCs: > >> * R-Car H2: R8A7790; > >> * R-Car M2: R8A7791. > >> > >>PHY initialization method is chosen based on the device id. > >>Default PHY settings are applied for Gen2 SoCs, which should > >>suit the Gen2 boards available. > >> > >>While at it, this also adds "sata-r8a7779" compatibility string > >>for R-Car H1 SATA, while keeping the old one for compatibility. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <valentine.barshak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >I know we are going around and around in circles regarding the bindings. > >But I think you need to submit that patch which documents the bindings > >that exist after this patch in order for the bindings, as they are > >used here, to be reviewed by the device tree people. > > OK, I'll resend. > > > > >Also, I think I found a typo which I have noted below. > > There's no typo. I'm using "sata_rcar" device name for compatibility with the current r8a7779 code > that uses the driver and registers "sata_rcar" device. Thanks, sorry for the noise. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
