Hello. On 11-10-2013 3:00, Simon Horman wrote:
[ CCed devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx as this involves DT compatibility strings ]
Note that I did CC then-existing devicetree-discuss list when posting the original driver but we got no feedback from there. That's why the binding documentation is missing.
RCAR Gen2 SoC has a different phy which is not compatible with
Hm, the SoCs family is called R-Car, is it so hard to remember? :-)
the older H1/M1 versions. This adds OF/platform device table and PHY initialization callbacks for H2/M2 (Gen2) SoC.
[...]
PHY initialization method is chosen based on the device id. Default PHY settings are applied for Gen2 SoC, which should suit the available Gen2 boards.
Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <valentine.barshak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[skip overquoating, grr :-]
@@ -770,8 +823,34 @@ static void sata_rcar_init_controller(struct ata_host *host) iowrite32(ATAPI_INT_ENABLE_SATAINT, base + ATAPI_INT_ENABLE_REG); } +static struct of_device_id sata_rcar_match[] = { + { + .compatible = "renesas,rcar-sata", + .data = (void *)RCAR_SATA + }, + { + .compatible = "renesas,sata-r8a7790", + .data = (void *)RCAR_GEN2_SATA + }, + { + .compatible = "renesas,sata-r8a7791", + .data = (void *)RCAR_GEN2_SATA + }, + {}, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sata_rcar_match); + +static const struct platform_device_id sata_rcar_id_table[] = { + { "sata_rcar", RCAR_SATA }, + { "sata-r8a7790", RCAR_GEN2_SATA }, + { "sata-r8a7791", RCAR_GEN2_SATA }, + { }, +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, sata_rcat_id_table); +
I think it would be better to add sata-r8a7779 and sata-r8a7778 to handle the GEN1 hardware and deprecate rcar-sata.
R8A7778 doesn't have the SATA controller AFAIR.
Less importantly I think it would be better to name RCAR_SATA as RCAR_GEN1_SATA.
Now that we have Gen2, yes. WBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
