Hello, On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 02:03:30AM +0000, Zhu Richard-R65037 wrote: > [Richard] Just like what we dicussed in the previous v1/v2 > patch-set. Shawn has the concerns that the IP speicific codes > shouldn't be put in the platform level. So he suggested that setup > a stand-alone driver, contained the imx6q ahci sata specific codes, > and re-use the generic ahci_platform driver as much as possible. > This imx6q standalone ahci sata driver just registers the platform > data, and the others would be handled by ahci_platform driver. Oh, I'm not objecting to the ahci specific part not being in platform code. I'm wondering whether specific handling for imx6q can be included into ahci_platform rather than being in its own driver. It just seems that there aren't too many differences. I could be misreading it so if there are enough differences to warrant a separate driver, please enlighten me. Thanks! -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
