Re: [PATCH] sata_rcar: fix interrupt handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello.

On 02-06-2013 11:58, Tejun Heo wrote:

The driver's interrupt handling code is too picky in deciding whether it should
handle an interrupt or not which causes completely unneeded spurious interrupts.
Thus make sata_rcar_{ata|serr}_interrupt() *void*; add ATA status register read
to sata_rcar_ata_interrupt() to clear an unexpected ATA interrupt -- it doesn't
get cleared by writing to the SATAINTSTAT register in the interrupt mode we use.

Also, in sata_rcar_ata_interrupt() we should check SATAINTSTAT register only for
enabled interrupts and we should clear  only those interrupts  that we have read
as active first time around, because else we have  a  race and risk clearing  an
interrupt that  can  occur between read  and write of the  SATAINTSTAT  register
and never registering it...

Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

     Darn, I forgot to Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx again.

Applied to libata/for-3.10-fixes w/ stable cc'd.  BTW, the driver
generates the following compile warning.

    CC      drivers/ata/sata_rcar.o
    drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c: In function ‘sata_rcar_thaw’:
    drivers/ata/sata_rcar.c:183:2: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow]

It compiles without warnings for me, IIRC. What version of gcc are you using?

Care to fix it?

   I'll look into it...

Thanks.

MBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux