On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:53:37AM +0200, Clemens Ladisch wrote: > Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > On 30-05-2013 18:26, Timur Tabi wrote: > >>> + const unsigned long timing[] = { 5, 100, 500}; > > > >> You'll save space and time if you also make this array "static", > >> otherwise the compiler will build the array every time this function is > >> called. > > > > No, *const* specifier is enough to not build this array every time. It will be put into the .const section. > > gcc disagrees: Doesn't really matter this or that way but let's do static const as, more than anything else, that's what other places are doing. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html